🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for other nations.

European Trend

Across Europe, a rising number of nations are considering similar restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and platforms are "robbing our children's youth". A law is expected to be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to enact a bill raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised families to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding resolution demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is given. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not establish mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a useful foundation," said a leading parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government pledged to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. One foundation established by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts argues that a strict age ban may not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are secure and suitable for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with additional use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced measures requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some figures to follow Australia's lead, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of the West, other states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations take a more nuanced position. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

While this worldwide debate evolves, the policies of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.